Women who are socially isolated have an increased risk for high blood pressure, researchers report. But men, not so much.
Scientists used data on 28,238 Canadian men and women aged 45 to 85 who are participating in a large continuing study on aging.
The researchers found that compared with married women, single women had a 28 percent higher risk of hypertension, divorced women a 21 percent higher risk, and widowed women a 33 percent higher risk.
Social connections were also significant. Compared with the one-quarter of women with the largest social networks — which ranged from 220 to 573 people — those in the lowest one-quarter, with fewer than 85 connections, were 15 percent more likely to have high blood pressure.
The associations were different, and generally weaker, in men. Men who lived alone had a lower risk of hypertension than men with partners, but the size of men’s social networks, or their participation in social activity, was not significantly associated with high blood pressure.
The senior author, Annalijn I. Conklin, an assistant professor at the University of British Columbia, said that the most important finding is that social ties seem to be more meaningful for women than for men. “Social ties matter for cardiovascular health,” she said, “and they matter more for women.”
Earlier last week, RWJBarnabas Health announced a groundbreaking initiative: the integration of social determinants of health (SDOH) into patient care through a program called “Health Beyond the Hospital.”
The CDC broadly defines SDOH as “conditions in the places where people live, learn, work, and play that affect a wide range of health and quality-of life-risks and outcomes.”
The American Academy of Family Physicians further explains that “these have a greater impact on population health than factors like biology, behavior, and health care.”
Thus, RWJBarnabas is attempting to integrate a more comprehensive care model for its patients. Barry Ostrowsky, President and CEO of the organization stated: “What defines our health is so much greater than genetics or clinical care; 80% of all health outcomes are due to social, behavioral, and environmental factors that are the social determinants of health.”
Ostrowsky continued: “We sought to bring the social determinants into the clinical process. Simultaneously, we are developing a patient-centered approach that serves patients in a consumer-friendly way while paying attention to their culture and language needs. The timely interventions made possible by Health Beyond the Hospital [HBH] will create a spiral that will positively impact the well-being of our patients and all of those caring for patients across our community.”
Indeed, the initiative will seek to “screen all patients for SDOH, including food security, access to housing, educational opportunities, smoking and substance use, transportation and other social and environmental factors. Just like temperature, weight, or blood pressure, HBH will assess all patients for factors that contribute to chronic disease, removing stigma around questions on housing, safety, or nutrition.”
Using this screening information, healthcare providers may potentially be able to better curate treatment plans and therapies according to a patient’s life-circumstances. For many patients, following through with a physician’s suggested recommendations is not a straightforward or easy process. Rather, there are numerous hurdles that may potentially arise, such as cost barriers, access to care issues, or even extenuating life-circumstances that deprioritize one’s own health. However, if the healthcare system overall is able to make a viable stride in this arena by integrating a heightened emphasis on SDOH as it applies to routine care, it may potentially be one way to improve health equity and patient outcomes.
The content of this article is not implied to be and should not be relied on or substituted for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment by any means, and is not written or intended as such. This content is for information and news purposes only. Consult with a trained medical professional for medical advice.
My fellow fitness instructors, trainers, coaches, and influencers:
I beg you, please, for the love of the people’s health, do not use your platform to spread misinformation about COVID-19. Really, please. As someone who spent eight years getting a master’s and a Ph.D. in public health (partially focused on health communication), some of the posts and comments I have seen floating around the ’gram from fitness or yoga accounts, quite frankly, terrify me—like that people are blowing the virus out of proportion, or that it’s not actually that big of a deal. All things that we’ve also heard from our current administration.
The spread of this misinformation matters because it misleads beliefs and behaviors. It is detrimental not only to your individual followers or clients, but also to the public as a whole. COVID-19 is real. This is a global pandemic. Every person who contracts COVID-19 has the capability to further spread the virus, thus prolonging its life. Public health communication researchers and practitioners work tirelessly to figure out how to best communicate the right information in the right way to the right people; spreading misinformation has the potential to undo all of that.
As leaders and role models in the fitness and movement space, I want us to do better. Your followers and clients look to you for fitness guidance, workouts, and expertise. They see you as a reliable source and are used to taking your advice on anything in the wellness space. They are primed to believe what you put out, especially if you self-identify or have otherwise been anointed as a “health expert.” You’ve heard it before: With great power comes great responsibility. We need to accept that responsibility and take it seriously.
I do understand that there is a plethora of COVID-19 information circulating, so much of it seemingly contradictory and thus potentially confusing and frustrating. The most well-meaning of us can easily fall into the trap of assuming something’s accuracy if we aren’t paying close attention. Add to that the fear for our own health or our careers and the grief for the lives we were living before March, along with the anger and anxiety about our reality today, and we are especially primed to react to COVID-19 news, especially involving headlines that are specifically crafted to activate negative emotions.
Reacting too quickly to COVID-19 news without first verifying it can lead to further disseminating misinformation, even unintentionally. In a social media sense, that translates to sending, sharing, reposting, or commenting something that spreads uninformed or ill-informed messaging. Doing so means you have now become a vector; you are now perpetuating the pandemic of misinformation and contributing to the pandemic of COVID-19.
In the Upper Amazon, mestizos are the Spanish-speaking descendants of Hispanic colonizers and the indigenous peoples of the jungle. Specialists such as John Bogle , Burton Malkiel , David Swenson and other folks have written influential books on the topic, utilizing information from studies in economics (monetary and behavioral). The branch of this science encompassing therapy by drugs, diet regime, workout, and other nonsurgical means.
Diuretic and laxative effects, psychological factors, and enthusiasm for a new method could initially fool people into considering they have benefited. Les décisions concernant les recommandations vaccinales ont aussi passé outre à plusieurs reprises le mauvais rapport coût-efficacité des vaccins recommandés.
A report written up in the Health-related Journal of Australia details the death of a 75 year old male who had a prostate cancer scare. The AAMC’s 2016 Medical College Enrollment Survey identified that 80% of schools have been concerned about the number of obtainable clinical instruction websites.
Un collègue radiologue m’a infiltré dans l’espace foraminal (des études récentes ont montré que cela n’avait pas montré son efficacité) et 36 heures après je reprenais le travail. For the duration of this year you go to neighborhood-based overall health-associated agencies and follow a woman and her loved ones through her pregnancy.
Former CEO of the University of Maryland Health-related Center, author of the books shown above, former senior investigator at the National Cancer Institute former head of infectious illnesses and director of the University of Maryland Greenabaum Cancer Center, Professor of Medicine and Public Policy at the University of Maryland, former chair Board of Governors of NIH Clinical Center, – along with a life lengthy really like of nature and a frequent visitor to Canaan Valley in West Virginia with my wife of 53 years.…